Use Of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Learning Tools and Their Impact on Academic Performance and Learning Satisfaction Among Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53350/Annalspakmed.2.1.18Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; Medical education; Academic performance; Learning satisfaction; Medical students; Digital learningAbstract
Background: Medical students are starting to embrace the use of artificial intelligence-enhanced learning tools to aid in their academic endeavors (concept understanding, revision, and exam preparation). Although they are on the increase in use, there is little evidence on their effects on academic performance and learning satisfaction among undergraduate medical students.
Objectives: To assess AI-aided learning tools as well as to establish the relationship between these tools and academic performance and student satisfaction with the learning process among medical students.
Methods: This analytic study was a cross-sectional study that was carried out at Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro in the period January 2025 to July 2025 on 90 undergraduate medical students attending an MBBS program. The non-probability convenience sampling method was employed to select the participants. The structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data based on demographic characteristics, academic performance, frequency and purpose of AI tool use, perceived usefulness, and learning satisfaction. A composite score was used to measure learning satisfaction in terms of a Likert-scale.
Results: 58.9% of the students claimed to use artificial intelligent-assisted learning tools frequently. It also showed higher academic performance between frequent users (75.06±8.51%) and occasional users (71.54±7.03%) and non-users (65.91±6.74%) (p=0.002). The weighted score of learning satisfaction was also significantly high among frequent users (31.62±4.72) than other groups (p < 0.001). It was observed that there was positive correlation between perceived usefulness of AI tools and academic performance (r = 0.39), as well as learning satisfaction (r = 0.64).
Conclusion: There is a positive correlation between AI-assisted learning tools and academic performance and the level of learning satisfaction among medical students. They can make modern medical education better through responsible and guided integration.
References
1. Ahsan Z. Integrating artificial intelligence into medical education: a narrative systematic review of current applications, challenges, and future directions. BMC Med Educ 2025;25:1187.
2. Shaw K, Henning MA, Webster CS. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review of the evidence for efficacy and future directions. Med Sci Educ 2025;35(3):1803-16.
3. Simoni J, Urtubia-Fernandez J, Mengual E, Simoni DA, Royo M, Egaña-Yin D, et al. Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2025;25(1):1609.
4. Hallquist E, Gupta I, Montalbano M, Loukas M. Applications of artificial intelligence in medical education: a systematic review. Cureus 2025;17(3):e79878.
5. Xu X, Chen Y, Miao J. Opportunities, challenges, and future directions of large language models, including ChatGPT in medical education: a systematic scoping review. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2024;21:6.
6. Jackson P, Sukumaran GP, Babu C, Tony MC, Jack DS, Reshma VR, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: perception among medical students. BMC Med Educ 2024;24:804.
7. Ali D, Fatemi Y, Boskabadi E, Nikfar M, Ugwuoke J, Ali H. ChatGPT in teaching and learning: a systematic review. Educ Sci 2024; 14(6):643.
8. Jensen LX, Buhl A, Sharma A, Bearman M, et al. Generative AI and higher education: a review of claims from the first months of ChatGPT. High Educ 2025;89:1145-61.
9. Baig MI, Yadegaridehkordi E. Factors influencing academic staff satisfaction and continuous usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 2025;22:5.
10. Batista J, Mesquita A, Carnaz G. Generative AI and higher education: trends, challenges, and future directions from a systematic literature review. Information 2024;15(11):676.
11. Haroud S, Saqri N. Generative AI in higher education: teachers’ and students’ perspectives on support, replacement, and digital literacy. Educ Sci 2025;15(4):396.
12. Qian Y. Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education: a systematic review of the field. TechTrends 2025;69:1105-20.
13. Wei Q, Yao Z, Cui Y, Wei B, Jin Z, Xu X. Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Biomed Inform 2024;151:104620.
14. Lu CB, Hu Y, Kang R, Liu Z. Generative artificial intelligence in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne. 2025;12:1682898.
15. Michalczak M, Zgoda W, Michalczak J, Żądło A, Nasser A, Tokarek T. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a narrative review. AI 2025;6(12):322.
16. Bin Jwair AA. Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: students’ journey through opportunities, challenges, and the horizons of academic transformation. Cogent Educ 2025;12:2589495.
17. Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn Individ Differ 2023;103:102274.
18. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11(6):887.
19. Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, Bozkurt A, Hickey DT, Huang R, et al. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn Environ 2023;10:15.
20. Lo CK. What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ Sci 2023;13(4):410.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ABDUL SAMAD, AISHA KHALID, ISHRAT BIBI, NADIA ASLAM, MEHRAB KHAN, RAMEEZ IQBAL MEMON

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
