ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES IN EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE PROCEDURES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Authors

  • MUHAMMAD TALHA Lahore Medical & Dental College(LMDC), Lahore, Pakistan
  • SALEHA NADEEM Al-Aleem Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
  • AAMINA SEEMAL Lahore Medical & Dental College (LM&DC), Lahore, Pakistan
  • MUSTAFA KHALID WAHEED Lahore Medical & Dental College (LM&DC), Lahore, Pakistan
  • MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM TAHIR Lahore Medical & Dental College(LMDC), Lahore, Pakistan
  • WALEED AHMAD Lahore Medical & Dental College (LM&DC), Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53350/Annalspakmed.1.3.4

Keywords:

Surgical site infection, emergency surgery, elective surgery, postoperative complications, tertiary care, infection control, Staphylococcus aureus.

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain one of the most frequent postoperative complications, leading to significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased healthcare costs. The risk of SSIs is strongly influenced by surgical urgency, patient comorbidities, and intraoperative aseptic practices.

Objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the incidence, microbial spectrum, and risk factors associated with SSIs in emergency versus elective surgical procedures performed at tertiary care centers in Punjab, Pakistan.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted from January 2023 to March 2024 across multiple tertiary care hospitals. A total of 90 patients were enrolled—45 undergoing emergency and 45 undergoing elective surgeries. Patient demographics, comorbidities, wound class, duration of surgery, and antibiotic use were documented. Postoperative wounds were evaluated on days 3, 7, and 30 according to CDC criteria. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, and significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: The overall SSI rate was 25.6%, with a higher incidence in emergency surgeries (31.1%) compared to elective procedures (20.0%). The majority of infections were superficial incisional (56.5%), followed by deep (26.1%) and organ-space (17.4%) infections. Staphylococcus aureus (43.5%) was the predominant pathogen, followed by E. coli (26.1%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.4%). Prolonged operative duration, diabetes mellitus, and contaminated wounds were identified as significant risk factors.

Conclusion: Emergency surgeries are associated with significantly higher SSI rates due to limited preoperative optimization and greater contamination risk. Strict adherence to aseptic techniques, timely antibiotic prophylaxis, and postoperative wound surveillance can substantially reduce infection-related morbidity.

References

1. Allegranzi B, et al. New WHO recommendations on intraoperative and postoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e288-303. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30402-9

2. Allegranzi B, et al. New WHO recommendations on preoperative measures for surgical site infection prevention: an evidence-based global perspective. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(12):e276-87. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30398-X

3. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784-791. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904

4. GlobalSurg Collaborative. Surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):516-525. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30101-4

5. Gillespie BM, et al. Worldwide incidence of surgical site infections in general surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2021;92:106031. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106031

6. Cai W, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):116. doi:10.1186/s12893-022-01567-x

7. Pal S, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: A predominant cause of surgical site infection—A systematic review of microbiological profiles and antibiotic resistance. Surgeon. 2019;17(6):e157-e166. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2019.02.009

8. Ademuyiwa AO, et al. Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries (FALCON): a pragmatic, multicentre, stratified, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10289):115-127. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01548-8

9. Raza M, et al. Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial sensitivity of surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30(6):593-598. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2020.06.593

10. Singh R, Kumar K, Myles PS. A comparative study of surgical site infections after emergency versus elective gastrointestinal surgery. Int Surg J. 2020;7(5):1610-1615. doi:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20201600

11. Kamath P, et al. Factors influencing surgical site infections in general surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg. 2019;43(7):1735-1742. doi:10.1007/s00268-019-04972-x

12. Malik F, et al. Microbiological profile of surgical site infections in a tertiary care hospital. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e19012. doi:10.7759/cureus.19012

13. Aslam A, et al. Surgical wound infection in emergency abdominal surgeries: a study from Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2019;31(2):227-231. doi:10.34091/jamc.v31i2.14

14. Anderson DJ, et al. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2018 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39(4):364-379. doi:10.1017/ice.2018.43

15. Liu Z, et al. Global burden of surgical infections: assessing and improving prevention strategies. World J Surg. 2021;45(9):2570-2578. doi:10.1007/s00268-021-06135-2

16. Qamar F, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis practices for surgical site infection prevention in Pakistan. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(9):901-905. doi:10.53350/pjmhs22169901

17. Taye M, et al. Surgical site infection and associated risk factors among general surgical patients: BMC Res Notes. 2019;12(1):443. doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4435-2

18. Bhangu A, et al. Global incidence of surgical site infection in low-resource settings: a large multicentre study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(5):516-525. (Same as #4)

19. Jadoon SK, et al. Comparative study of wound infection between elective and emergency abdominal surgeries. Pak J Surg. 2023;39(4):doi:10.46568/pjs.3904.x

20. Kirkham AM, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection after lower‐limb arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(5):S57-S67. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.007

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

TALHA, M., NADEEM, S., SEEMAL, A., WAHEED, M. K., TAHIR5, M. I., & AHMAD, W. (2025). ASSESSMENT OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES IN EMERGENCY VERSUS ELECTIVE PROCEDURES: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. Annals of Pakistan Medical & Allied Professionals, 1(3, June), 4–9. https://doi.org/10.53350/Annalspakmed.1.3.4